All preprints

Preprint · v3

Finiteness thresholds and surface bounds for graph Jacobians

Free PDF · 20 pages · 0.71 MB

Abstract

For a finite connected graph GG, let e(G)e(G) be the exponent of its Jacobian and Δ(G)\Delta(G) its maximum degree. For each integer b≥1b\ge1, the simple biconnected graphs with e(G)≤be(G)\le b form finitely many isomorphism classes if and only if b≤7b\le7; exactly eleven occur with e(G)≤7e(G)\le7. The simple biconnected graphs with e(G)−Δ(G)≤3e(G)-\Delta(G)\le3 are KnK_n (n≥3n\ge3), C4C_4, C5C_5 and K2,3K_{2,3}. At exponent eight, the number of vertices is unbounded among simple planar bipartite biconnected graphs of maximum degree four. For every integer r≥1r\ge1, there is a simple planar biconnected graph whose Jacobian is isomorphic to (ℤ/8ℤ)r(\mathbb Z/8\mathbb Z)^r, with explicit divisor generators and an orthogonal decomposition of its monodromy pairing. Every simple 33-connected planar graph satisfies 2|V(G)|−4≤(e(G)−Δ(G)+1)22|V(G)|-4\le(e(G)-\Delta(G)+1)^2 and 2|V(G)|−5≤3e(G)2/52|V(G)|-5\le3e(G)^2/5. Every simple graph with a cellular torus embedding whose full inverse image in the universal cover of the torus is 33-connected satisfies |V(G)|≤e(G)2|V(G)|\le e(G)^2.

MSC 2020

05C25
Graphs and abstract algebra (groups, rings, fields, etc.)
05C50
Graphs and linear algebra (matrices, eigenvalues, etc.)
05C10
Planar graphs; geometric and topological aspects of graph theory
05C40
Connectivity
20K01
Finite abelian groups

Mathematics Subject Classification 2020

Record

Version DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23622186
All versions
10.5281/zenodo.22859832
Subjects
Graph Jacobian; exponent; biconnected graph; integral potential; monodromy pairing; planar graph; toroidal embedding
Language
English

Cite this paper

Anass Nifa. Finiteness thresholds and surface bounds for graph Jacobians. Preprint, Zenodo, v3 (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23622186

References

As listed in the manuscript bibliography.

  1. [1]

    A. Azimi, R. B. Bapat and M. Farrokhi D. G., Resistance distance of blowups of trees, Discrete Math. 344 (2021), no. 7, Article 112387. 10.1016/j.disc.2021.112387.

    DOI
  2. [2]

    R. Bacher, P. de la Harpe and T. Nagnibeda, The lattice of integral flows and the lattice of integral cuts on a finite graph, Bull. Soc. Math. France 125 (1997), no. 2, 167–198. 10.24033/bsmf.2303.

    DOI
  3. [3]

    M. Baker and F. Shokrieh, Chip-firing games, potential theory on graphs, and spanning trees, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 120 (2013), no. 1, 164–182. 10.1016/j.jcta.2012.07.011.

    DOI
  4. [4]

    M. Beck and S. Robins, Computing the Continuous Discretely: Integer-Point Enumeration in Polyhedra, second ed., Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York, 2015. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2969-6.

    DOI
  5. [5]

    N. Biggs, Algebraic potential theory on graphs, Bull. London Math. Soc. 29 (1997), no. 6, 641–682. 10.1112/S0024609397003305.

    DOI
  6. [6]

    D. Brandfonbrener, P. Devlin, N. Friedenberg, Y. Ke, S. Marcus, H. Reichard and E. Sciamma, Two-vertex generators of Jacobians of graphs, Electron. J. Combin. 25 (2018), no. 1, P1.15, 18 pp. 10.37236/7302.

    DOI
  7. [7]

    Y. Colin de Verdière, Comment rendre géodésique une triangulation d’une surface?, Enseign. Math. (2) 37 (1991), nos. 3–4, 201–212.

  8. [8]

    R. Diestel, Graph Theory, fifth ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 173, Springer, Berlin, 2017. 10.1007/978-3-662-53622-3.

    DOI
  9. [9]

    F. Dörfler and F. Bullo, Kron reduction of graphs with applications to electrical networks, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 60 (2013), no. 1, 150–163. 10.1109/TCSI.2012.2215780.

    DOI
  10. [10]

    X. Dong, W. Guo and G. Jiang, On the critical group of the k-partite graph, preprint (2024), arXiv:2409.02654v1.

    arXiv v1
  11. [11]

    J. Erickson and P. Lin, A toroidal Maxwell–Cremona–Delaunay correspondence, J. Comput. Geom. 12 (2021), no. 2, 55–85. 10.20382/jocg.v12i2a4.

    DOI
  12. [12]

    L. Gaudet, D. Jensen, D. Ranganathan, N. Wawrykow and T. Weisman, Realization of groups with pairing as Jacobians of finite graphs, Ann. Comb. 22 (2018), no. 4, 781–801. 10.1007/s00026-018-0406-0.

    DOI
  13. [13]

    Q. Huang, H. Chen and Q. Deng, Resistance distances and the Kirchhoff index in double graphs, J. Appl. Math. Comput. 50 (2016), 1–14. 10.1007/s12190-014-0855-5.

    DOI
  14. [14]

    B. Jacobson, A. Niedermaier and V. Reiner, Critical groups for complete multipartite graphs and Cartesian products of complete graphs, J. Graph Theory 44 (2003), no. 3, 231–250. 10.1002/jgt.10139.

    DOI
  15. [15]

    H. Liu, L. Li, L. You, H. Hua and L. Chen, Enumeration of spanning trees and resistance distances of generalized blow-up graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 381 (2026), 276–291. 10.1016/j.dam.2025.11.014. arXiv:2504.15314v1 (2025).

    DOI · arXiv v1
  16. [16]

    H. Lheem, D. Li, C. J. Quines and J. Zhang, Exponents of Jacobians of graphs and regular matroids, Rose-Hulman Undergrad. Math. J. 21 (2020), no. 2, Article 6. arXiv:1910.06442v2 (2021).

    arXiv v2
  17. [17]

    D. Lorenzini, A finite group attached to the Laplacian of a graph, Discrete Math. 91 (1991), no. 3, 277–282. 10.1016/0012-365X(90)90236-B.

    DOI
  18. [18]

    D. Lorenzini, Smith normal form and Laplacians, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 98 (2008), no. 6, 1271–1300. 10.1016/j.jctb.2008.02.002.

    DOI
  19. [19]

    R. Lyons and Y. Peres, Probability on Trees and Networks, Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics, vol. 42, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2016. 10.1017/9781316672815.

    DOI
  20. [20]

    M. C. Marino and N. Zagaglia Salvi, Generalizing double graphs, Atti Accad. Peloritana Pericolanti Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur. 85 (2007), Article C1A0702002. 10.1478/C1A0702002.

    DOI
  21. [21]

    E. Munarini, C. Perelli Cippo, A. Scagliola and N. Zagaglia Salvi, Double graphs, Discrete Math. 308 (2008), nos. 2–3, 242–254. 10.1016/j.disc.2006.11.038.

    DOI
  22. [22]

    F. Shokrieh, The monodromy pairing and discrete logarithm on the Jacobian of finite graphs, J. Math. Cryptol. 4 (2010), no. 1, 43–56. 10.1515/JMC.2010.002.

    DOI
  23. [23]

    W. Sun, Y. Yang and S.-J. Xu, Resistance distance and Kirchhoff index of unbalanced blowups of graphs, Discrete Math. 348 (2025), no. 3, Article 114327. 10.1016/j.disc.2024.114327.

    DOI
  24. [24]

    Y. Tian and Y. Takane, Schur complements and Banachiewicz–Schur forms, Electron. J. Linear Algebra 13 (2005), 405–418. 10.13001/1081-3810.1171.

    DOI
  25. [25]

    J. A. Tropp, ACM 204: Matrix Analysis, Caltech CMS Lecture Notes 2022-01, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 2022. 10.7907/m421-yb89.

    DOI
  26. [26]

    W. T. Tutte, How to draw a graph, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 13 (1963), 743–767. 10.1112/plms/s3-13.1.743.

    DOI
  27. [27]

    Y. Wang, D. Li and W. Yan, Resistance distance in blowup graphs, Discrete Math. 349 (2026), no. 2, Article 114765. 10.1016/j.disc.2025.114765.

    DOI
  28. [28]

    S. Xu and K. Xu, Resistance distances in generalized join graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 362 (2025), 18–33. 10.1016/j.dam.2024.11.013.

    DOI